|
Well, this really depends....
e.g. if one compares a 4cpu 8400 with 2GB of memory with
three single cpu pentiums with 64MB of memory then I will
assure you that the 8400 is better. But since there are no
details about the systems involved, I would not hazard to
guess.
Amy
reply to
decwet::lenox
lenox@zso.dec.com
|
| According to the sizing guidelines I got from the internal Web, stating you
need 1/3 of a EV5 CPU running at 300 MHz, I was thinking to propose an
AlphaServer 4000 5/400 with 1 CPU and 512 MB of memory running Windows-NT, with
2 disks for the index files.
We expect to run 3 backup streams (1 or each Ethernet board) writing to a TL894
at the maximum speed allowed by Ethernet (800 KB/sec ?).
Is it possible ?
I hope the information I supplied would be enough.
Thanks in advance,
regards.
Luigi
|
| >According to the sizing guidelines I got from the internal Web, stating you
>need 1/3 of a EV5 CPU running at 300 MHz, I was thinking to propose an
>AlphaServer 4000 5/400 with 1 CPU and 512 MB of memory running Windows-NT, with
>2 disks for the index files.
>
>We expect to run 3 backup streams (1 or each Ethernet board) writing to a TL894
>at the maximum speed allowed by Ethernet (800 KB/sec ?).
Note that this totals about 2.5 MB/sec, which is unlikely to keep
even one TZ89 streaming. I assume that you're proposing a TL894
for capacity rather than for tape throughput, correct?
In this situation, I would direct the backup streams to one or
two drives (set NetWorker's active device count to 1 or 2). If
you try to drive all four, then you will end up wasting CPU on
interprocess communication (1 or 2 tape processes vs. 4), but you
won't get any additional throughput because the network is a
bottleneck.
>Is it possible ?
I think so, but we haven't done much testing with multiple
Ethernets.
Wes
|