| Title: | DISCO General users' conference |
| Moderator: | RUTILE::LOGAN_E |
| Created: | Fri May 26 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Mon Aug 21 1995 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 121 |
| Total number of notes: | 449 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36.1 | Rdb uses G_FLOATING instead of D_FLOATING... | VOLVOX::VANPAMEL | Geert VAN PAMEL @BRO, ADG Brussels | Fri Nov 10 1989 09:26 | 18 |
| 36.2 | code generation functionality ? | GVA05::BODE | Tue Nov 28 1989 11:14 | 9 | |
| 36.3 | FORTRAN, PASCAL, C and Rdb know about G_FLOATING | VOLVOX::VANPAMEL | Geert VAN PAMEL @BRO, ADG Brussels | Wed Nov 29 1989 11:48 | 52 |
| 36.4 | RDB 3.1 | SHAPES::SMITHB | Bazzoo� | Thu Nov 30 1989 11:45 | 6 |
| 36.5 | prefer 1.solution | GVA05::BODE | Thu Nov 30 1989 11:51 | 8 | |
| 36.6 | I think you prefer solution THREE, Renate ? | BIS::VANPAMEL | Geert VAN PAMEL @BRO, ADG Brussels | Thu Nov 30 1989 14:06 | 19 |
| 36.7 | yes, solution 3 | GVA05::BODE | Fri Dec 01 1989 14:55 | 5 | |
| 36.8 | F_FLOATING suffices now ! | AYOV10::PDAGLEISH | Fri Dec 01 1989 17:53 | 10 | |
| 36.9 | We use G_FLOATING | SHIRE::ABAGWELL | Wed Dec 13 1989 15:50 | 9 | |
| 36.10 | Basically you do understand what we are discussing... | VOLVOX::VANPAMEL | Geert VAN PAMEL @BRO, ADG Brussels | Thu Dec 14 1989 08:52 | 17 |