| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 4459.1 | | JAMIN::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Fri Feb 07 1997 18:14 | 14 |
| > I just installed a network card (3c590b-combo) in my gateway system
> running W95. I added it using the control panel add device which went
> ok but now I cannot use netscape or any other application with dialup
> ppp connection.
I had a problem when my system was configured for both
Ethernet and Dial-Up. Some of the processes over Ethernet
were using the TCP/IP address I had configured for Dial-Up.
A work-around was to create separate "Hardware Configurations"
(Control Panel->System) where one contained the Ethernet
card and the other contained the "Dial-Up" adapter. On
startup you have to choose a hardware configuration from
a list (unless Windows 95 Plug-and-Play can figure it out).
|
| 4459.2 | IS a reboot required to change ? | VMSNET::F_HARRIS | old hardware hacker | Fri Feb 07 1997 21:16 | 7 |
|
Did you add the device 2 times in the
device tables with separate configurations ? Will I have to reboot
to use each configuration ?
Thanks , Frank
|
| 4459.3 | Old problem | PSCESP::LUIS | Luis Gonz�lez - S.I. Madrid | Sat Feb 08 1997 06:58 | 11 |
| Re. 0
I (and many others) experienced this problem when using Altavista Tunnel
Personal Edition, and at that time the dual hardware configuration was the
only workaround. Yes, you must reboot to switch from one config. to other.
I would recommend that you take a look to the Tunnel support Forum (you can find
it in the Tunnel Home Page). There a few topics covering this issue and may be
in the last months somebody has found a less akward workaround.
Luis
|
| 4459.4 | ISDN 1.1 Accelerator Pack fixes this | OHFSS1::STREK | | Sat Feb 08 1997 11:27 | 15 |
| This is a well documented problem with Windows95 which is fixed by
applying the ISDN 1.1 Accelerator Pack from Microsoft. You can find it
at
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/common/aa2725.htm
This fix is applicable even if you are not using ISDN, so don't let the
name fool you. I have been running with the Accelerator pack using a
modem/PPP connection, a Ethernet IP connection and the Tunnel. It
works great!
As an alternative, you could purchase a new system that is loaded with
Windows 95 OEM SR2. This includes the bits in the ISDN update.
Gary
|
| 4459.5 | | PYRO::RON | Ron S. van Zuylen | Sat Feb 08 1997 18:55 | 10 |
| Well documented bug? The "bug" is only if you have 3 or more network
interfaces. A situation you get into when you use the Tunnel software
and a local Ethernet card. ("PPP" + "Tunnel" + "Ethernet"). I don't
think this is the situation the original noter is in.
If you want to have a local private TCP/IP on your Ethernet *and*
dial-in, the key is to configure your TCP/IP routes correctly. With
or without the Tunnel or the ISDN patch.
--Ron
|
| 4459.6 | See KB Article Q140460 | OHFSS1::STREK | | Sun Feb 09 1997 10:18 | 82 |
| The following Microsoft KB article is the problem I was refering to
in .-2 that the ISDN update fixed, at least in my case. The PPP
adapater never receives an address when IP is bound to a NIC as well as
to the Dial up adapter.
-----------------
PSS ID Number: Q140460
Article last modified on 10-04-1996
PSS database name: WIN95X
95
WINDOWS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this article applies to:
- Microsoft Windows 95
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SYMPTOMS
========
If you have two or more network adapters in your computer and you are
using Dial-Up Networking to connect to a network using the TCP/IP
protocol, you may not be assigned an IP address and may not be able to
use a static IP address. When this occurs, running Winipcfg.exe shows
an
IP address and subnet mask of 0.0.0.0, even though you are connected
with
the TCP/IP protocol.
CAUSE
=====
This problem can occur when you have two or more network adapters
installed with TCP/IP bound to each, and you have TCP/IP bound to the
Dial-Up Networking adapter.
RESOLUTION
==========
Use the following steps to work around the problem:
1. In Control Panel, double-click the Network icon.
2. Click one of the network adapters. (NOTE: Do not click the Dial-Up
Networking adapter.)
3. Click Properties.
4. On the Bindings tab, click the TCP/IP check box to clear it, and
then click OK.
5. If you have more than two network adapters, repeat steps 2-4 until
TCP/IP is bound to only one network adapter and the Dial-Up
Networking
adapter.
6. Click OK until you return to Control Panel. When you are prompted to
restart your computer, do so.
STATUS
======
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft Windows 95.
We
are researching this problem and will post new information here in the
Microsoft Knowledge Base as it becomes available.
KBCategory: kbnetwork kbenv kbpolicy
KBSubcategory: win95 dun
Additional reference words: 95
=============================================================================
Copyright Microsoft Corporation 1996.
|
| 4459.7 | I will try the patch | VMSNET::F_HARRIS | old hardware hacker | Sun Feb 09 1997 19:52 | 6 |
|
I will load the patch and see how it goes ,thanks
for the replies . I will let you know the results .
Thanks again , Frank
|
| 4459.8 | | a-61.tunnel.crl.dec.com::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Feb 10 1997 05:48 | 15 |
| Frank, I'm sure the ISDN accelerator pack will help. This is definitely a
problem for ANY system with 2 network adapters or more who try to connect
to a dial-up. Basically, the stack is corrupt before you dial up and you
aren't assigned a network address (do a route print and you won't see
any information for your dial-up).
Microsoft basically never tested multihomed configurations for Windows 95.
When we first reported this bug to them, their answer was "Windows 95 was
never inteded as a multi-homed operating system". Not sure they ever would
have fixed it if they weren't bit by it themselves with ISDN.
As far as the advice to check the tunnel home page, I'm afraid that is
on a system which is no longer on Digital's network.
Jeff
|
| 4459.9 | The patch did work ! YES | VMSNET::F_HARRIS | old hardware hacker | Mon Feb 10 1997 10:31 | 8 |
|
Thanks for all of the support , I don't think my
system or me could have taken 1 more reboot from changing
configurations . The ISDN patch did fix the problems . I was on the
verge of taking the network card back to the store .
Thanks , Frank
|